Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Char v. Tresch, et al.
as 24-868
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN CHAR
Defendant:
MAURA TRESCH, RICHARD BANNER, DEANE HATAKEYAMA and others
Char v. Tresch et al
as 1:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Defendant:
Maura Tresch, Richard Banner, Deane Hatakeyama and others
Interested Party:
Litigation Coordinator, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv07806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alfred Jackson v. Opus Fund Services USA LLC
as 2:2020cv05774
Defendant:
Opus Fund Services (USA) LLC, Deloitte and Touche LLP, Deloitte Tax, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Maxx Venture Fund H, LLC, Michael Jackson, Alfred Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bernard Oretekor v. William Barr
as 19-71992
Petitioner:
BERNARD OGIE ORETEKOR
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Latishe Ann Anderson et al v. Equifax Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00950
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gutierrez, Amy L. Christen, Latishe Ann Anderson and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc. and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ammini et al v. Labgold et al
as 5:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
Chandramohan V Ammini , Sarah J Brashears , Gregory Bogdan and others
Defendant:
Marc R. Labgold , Dana Ichinotsubo, Dory Ichinotsubo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sapp v. ATF et al
as 4:2013cv04673
Plaintiff:
Ramon Jermaine Sapp
Defendant:
ATF, DOJ, BNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sapp v. ATF et al
as 4:2013cv04549
Plaintiff:
Ramon Jermaine Sapp
Defendant:
ATF, DOJ, BNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long Stay, Inc. v. Myland Hawaii Realty, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv00542
Plaintiff:
Long Stay, Inc.
Defendant:
Myland Hawaii Realty, Ltd., Hideo Mita, Kazuhiko Udagawa and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
