Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Newman, et al.
as 24-212
Defendant / Appellant:
SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, TROY NEWMAN, ALBIN RHOMBERG and others
Defendant:
DAVID DALEIDEN, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Center for Medical Progress, et al.
as 23-4398
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID DALEIDEN, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Defendant:
SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, TROY NEWMAN, ALBIN RHOMBERG and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California, PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Gibson v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
as 3:2023cv04529
Plaintiff:
Davina Gibson
Defendant:
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Amy Pawl Pawlukiewicz et al v. Planned Parenthood Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv09611
Plaintiff:
Amy Pawlukiewicz, Jacqueline Dilanchyan, Paige Miller and others
Defendant:
Planned Parenthood Los Angeles and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
National Abortion Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al
as 21-15955
Defendant:
CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, TROY NEWMAN, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis and others
Petitioner:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA and BETH PARKER
Appellant:
BRENTFORD J. FERREIRA and STEVEN COOLEY
Not Yet Classified:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION
National Abortion Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al
as 21-15953
Defendant / Appellant:
BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis and CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS
Defendant:
TROY NEWMAN
Petitioner:
BETH PARKER and PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA
Not Yet Classified:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Sandra Merritt, et al
as 20-16820
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC. and others
Defendant:
GERARDO ADRIAN LOPEZ, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, ALBIN RHOMBERG and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, AKA Susan Tennenbaum
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Albin Rhomberg, et al
as 20-16773
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC. and others
Defendant:
GERARDO ADRIAN LOPEZ, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALBIN RHOMBERG
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al
as 20-16068
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC. and others
Defendant:
GERARDO ADRIAN LOPEZ, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, ALBIN RHOMBERG and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TROY NEWMAN
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al
as 20-16070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS and others
Defendant:
TROY NEWMAN, ALBIN RHOMBERG and SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, AKA Susan Tennenbaum
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
