Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Don't Cage Our Oceans et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2022cv01627
Plaintiff:
Don't Cage Our Oceans, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources and others
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Scott A Spellmon and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Pasqua Yaqui Tribe, et al v. Arizona Rock Products Associat, et al
as 21-16791
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PASQUA YAQUI TRIBE, QUINAULT INDIAN NATION, FOND DU LAC BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA and others
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MICHAEL REGAN, EPA Administrator and TAYLOR N. FERRELL, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
ARIZONA ROCK PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL STONE, SAND, AND GRAVEL ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA CATTLE FEEDERS ASSOCIATION and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL SACKETT
Institute for Fisheries Res., et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 21-15640
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES, CASCADIA WILDLANDS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, JANET WOODCOCK, Acting Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AQUABOUNTY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
State of Washington et al v. Russell Vought et al
as 2:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
Association Of King County Historical Organizations, State of Washington, Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska and others
Defendant:
National Archives and Records Administration, Emily W. Murphy, Office of Management and Budget and others
Amicus Curiae:
Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality and Historians
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Thomas Landreth v. USA, et al
as 20-35683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS G. LANDRETH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, QUINAULT INDIAN NATION and DOES, Persons or Parties Unknown who may have an interest in property at Township 23 North, Range 10 West, Section 13, Lot 19
Pasqua Yaqui Tribe et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 4:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler, RD James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Plaintiff:
Tohono O'odham Nation, Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin, Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Tulalip Tribes, et al
as 18-35441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
Respondent - Appellee:
TULALIP TRIBES, SUQUAMISH TRIBE, PUYALLUP TRIBE and others
Real-party-in-interest - Real Party In Interest:
HOH INDIAN TRIBE, LUMMI INDIAN NATION, QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE and others
Makah Indian Tribe v. State of Washington, et al
as 18-35369
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE and QUINAULT INDIAN NATION
Real Party In Interest:
HOH INDIAN TRIBE, LUMMI INDIAN NATION, PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE and others
USA, et al v. Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, et al
as 17-35760
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner - Appellant:
SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE and SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Real-party-in-interest:
TULALIP TRIBES, QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE, HOH TRIBE and others
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. State of Washington
as 2:2017sp00003
Petitioner:
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians
Respondent:
State of Washington and Upper Skagit Indian Tribe
Intervenor:
Nisqually Indian Tribe and Tulalip Tribes
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Lummi Indian Nation , Puyallup Tribe and Quinault Indian Nation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
