Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Valentine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv05523
Plaintiff:
Cynthia R Valentine
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Valentine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv06016
Plaintiff:
Cynthia R Valentine
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Lawrence Valentine
as 11-10319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Lawrence Valentine v. Rodney Chandler
as 09-71233
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Respondent:
RODNEY CHANDLER
Quoc Luu v. R. Babcock, et al
as 09-15704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUOC XUONG LUU
Defendant - Appellee:
R. BABCOCK, Lieutenant, R. VALENTINE, Correction Officer and G. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer
LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE v. USA
as 2:2009cv00586
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lawrence R. Valentine
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lawrence Valentine v. USDC-CEF
as 09-70349
:
In re: LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
RODNEY CHANDLER
Valentine, et al v. Don Mills
as 08-70719
In Re:
In re: LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE R. VALENTINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
TAFT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUITION and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
