Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Taylor v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-3003
Plaintiff: JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant: STATE OF OREGON and ROBERT D. JONES, (34176)
Taylor v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff: Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant: State of Oregon and Robert D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Russell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff: Robert Charles Jones
Defendant: Perry Russell and Sandra Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Russell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00342
Plaintiff: Robert Earl Jones
Defendant: Perry Russell and Sandra Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2023cv00563
Plaintiff: Robert T. Jones
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Jones v. Office of the Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00193
Petitioner: Robert C. Jones
Respondent: Office of the Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Reynolds et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00137
Plaintiff: Robert E. Jones
Defendant: Kathryn Reynolds and Charles Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Robert Jones, Jr.
as 22-10002
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERT MARCELLUS JONES, Jr.
Thomas Murphy v. Oregon Circuit Court, et al
as 21-35608
Petitioner / Appellant: THOMAS ROBERT MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee: OREGON CIRCUIT COURT, PRETRIAL/PROBATION OR PAROLE SERVICES, ROBERT CLIVE JONES, U.S. District Court Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00973
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?