Cases 1 - 10 of 2,325
Chan et al v. Stefanski et al
as 3:2024cv03631
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Chan, Shaynna Myers, Stefan Ascierto and others
Defendant:
John Stefanski, City of San Rafael and Robert Sinnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia-Guizar v. USA
as 1:2024cv00256
Petitioner:
Rafael Garcia-Guizar
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bustos-Alonso v. Garland
as 24-3749
Petitioner:
RAFAEL BUSTOS-ALONSO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Amazon.Com, Inc. et al v. Almowlad et al
as 3:2024cv03627
Plaintiff:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Ahmed Ebrahim Almowlad, Kevin Estrada, Falope Fatunmise and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Rafael-Diego, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3722
Petitioner:
EULALIA RAFAEL-DIEGO, ALEXANDER GREGORIO-RAFAEL and ZAYRA GREGORIO-RAFAEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Samia Hakim et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2024cv01253
Plaintiff:
Samia Kamel Gurges Hakim, Parthenia M.A.S. Estafanous and Rafael M.A.S Estafanous
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Shah et al v. Anagnost et al
as 3:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah and Autodesk, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew Anagnost, Karen Blasing, Reid French and others
Ataides Gama, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3449
Petitioner:
MARCOS DAVI ATAIDES GAMA, ELIZABETH ALVES RIBEIRO GAMA, FILLIPE RIBEIRO GAMA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez Rafael v. Garland
as 24-3206
Petitioner:
JOSE OSWVALDO RODRIGUEZ RAFAEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-3089
Petitioner:
RAFAEL ALFREDO RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
