Cases 1 - 10 of 2,139
Edmiston v. Saucedo, et al.
as 24-3145
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN EDMISTON
Defendant:
RICARDO SAUCEDO, JAMES WEILAND, C.E.R.T. "Senior and WILLIAM GITTERE, added per #7 Screening Order; #8 AC
Ricardo Vasquez v. Fitness Equipment Services, LLC
as 5:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Vasquez
Defendant:
Fitness Equipment Services, LLC d/b/a Sole Fitness, a Utah limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Robles
as 24-2809
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICARDO ROBLES
Jackson v. Bode
as 3:2024cv02630
Plaintiff:
Jeovani Jackson
Defendant:
Justin Hughes Bode and Ricardo Candela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Martinez-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2549
Petitioner:
ANA MARIA DILSIA MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ, GERSON RICARDO AMAYA-MARTINEZ and DIEGO IVAN AMAYA-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cucunubo Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2428
Petitioner:
JOSE RICARDO CUCUNUBO PEREZ, YULI ANDREA MEDINA GONZALEZ, CHRISTIAN RICHARD CUCUNUBO MEDINA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
