Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Alexander Bayonne Stross v. West Covina Pacific Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv06097
Plaintiff: Alexander Bayonne Stross
Defendant: West Covina Pacific Corporation West Covina Pacific Corporation dba Donaji & Associates doing business as Donaji & Associates and Diamond Ridge Corporation Diamond Ridge Corporation dba Remax Champions doing business as Remax Champions
Cross Defendant: Donaji G. Zamora and West Covina Pacific Corporation
Cross Claimant: Diamond Ridge Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02614
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019at01233
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Advanced Transit Dynamics, Inc. v. Ridge Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01877
Plaintiff: Advanced Transit Dynamics, Inc.
Defendant: Ridge Corporation
Galaxy Gaming of Oregon, LLC, et al v. Charles Burdick, et al
as 09-35205
Plaintiff - Appellant: GALAXY GAMING OF OREGON, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company, GALAXY GAMING, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, GALAXY GAMING, INC., a Nevada corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES BURDICK, ALFRED C. BATHKE and JOHN DOES, I-C
Galaxy Gaming of Oregon, LLC, et al v. Burdick, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2007cv01275
Plaintiff: Galaxy Gaming of Oregon, LLC, Galaxy Gaming of Oregon, LLC, Galaxy Gaming, LLC and others
Defendant: Charles Burdick, Alfred C. Bathke and I-C Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00152
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?