Cases 1 - 10 of 1,149
Jorge Alejandro Rojas v. Joey Builders Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03958
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Joey Builders Inc. and Liel Levi
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Molina Rojas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3010
Petitioner:
MAYRA MOLINA ROJAS and LESLIE PAHUAMBA MOLINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Casey v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Sean L. Casey, II
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Igbokwe and Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas-Osegueda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2871
Petitioner:
KATHERYN MARIBEL ROJAS-OSEGUEDA and JOSE LEONARDO PORTILLO-ROJAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Del Rosario Rojas, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2732
Plaintiff:
EVELYN DEL ROSARIO ROJAS and J. ASUNCION ROJAS BAUTISTA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Carmona Rojas v. Garland
as 24-2544
Petitioner:
JUAN CARMONA ROJAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gary Blackwell et al v. City of Beaumont et al
as 5:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Gary Blackwell and Shannon Luellen
Defendant:
City of Beaumont, Officer Anthony Becerra, Officer Fabian Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rojas Ruiz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2398
Petitioner:
YAMIL ALEXANDER ROJAS RUIZ, LESLIE ELENA RUFFASTO LIVIA and YARED YAMIL ROJAS RUFFASTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rojas Martinez et al v. Clake LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Orquidea Rojas Martinez and Ricardo Ruiz
Defendant:
Clake LLC and Eddi Matti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
