Cases 1 - 10 of 710
Rosales-Escareno v. Garland
as 24-3054
Petitioner:
ADOLFO ROSALES-ESCARENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rosales v. Nathan
as 4:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Juan Rosales
Defendant:
Paul H. Nathan, Jr.
Counter Claimant:
Paul H Nathan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rosales et al v. Community Blood Center et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Amanda Rosales and The Estate of Glenn K. Fry
Defendant:
Community Blood Center dba Solvita, Diane Wilson, Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Paz-Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2174
Petitioner:
JORGE AUGUSTO PAZ-ROSALES and JOSE AUGUSTO PAZ-CASTANON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tamika Tate et al v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 2:2024cv02331
Plaintiff:
Tamika Tate and Audi Osborne
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino, Officer J. Rosales, Officer M. Mckray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez Rosales v. Garland
as 24-1505
Petitioner:
ZAIRA BEATRIZ MARTINEZ ROSALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Rosales
as 24-1382
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JORGE LUIS ROSALES
Martinez de Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1379
Petitioner:
MARIA ESMERALDA MARTINEZ DE ROSALES, ISIDRO LEONEL ROSALES QUIJANO, BRYAN STEVEN ROSALES MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Shaun A. Jones v. C.O. Moisa et al
as 2:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
Shaun A. Jones
Defendant:
C.O. Moisa, Sgt. John Doe One, John Doe One and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kelly v. Rosales, et al.
as 24-827
Plaintiff:
SHANNON KELLY
Defendant:
M. ROSALES, Correctional Lieutenant, official capacity, J. CODY, Correctional Sergeant, official capacity and J. MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer, official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
