Cases 1 - 10 of 1,315
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bennett v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-3119
Petitioner:
DAVID BENNETT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
MONROE DETENTION CENTER, YOLO COUNTY JAIL, WELL PATH DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jiaming Yu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv03595
Plaintiff:
Jiaming Yu
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Rosemary Langley Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Essex et al v. County of Imperial, a Governmental Entity et al
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Elicia Essex and Kristina Essex
Defendant:
County of Imperial, Naphcare, Rosemary Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Crawford v. Boustead Securities, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03172
Plaintiff:
Rosemary C Crawford
Defendant:
Boustead Securities, LLC, Melvin Pirchesky, Eagle Ventures, Inc. and others
In Re Debtor Onejet, Inc. et al
as 2:2024mc00054
Plaintiff:
Rosemary C Crawford
Defendant:
Boustead Securities, LLC, Melvin Pirchesky, Eagle Ventures, Inc. and others
First and Rosemary Senior Housing, LP v. Pierre
as 24-2427
Plaintiff:
FIRST AND ROSEMARY SENIOR HOUSING, LP
Defendant:
GEORGE PIERRE
Tripati v. Carter, et al.
as 24-2191
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
PAUL EDWARD CARTER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNKNOWN CARTER, MICHAEL EVAN GOTTFRIED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
