Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Teradata Corporation, et al v. SAP SE, et al
as 23-16065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERADATA CORPORATION, TERADATA US, INC. and TERADATA OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SAP SE, SAP AMERICA, INC. and SAP LABS, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Frederick Sap v. Hairline Time, LLC
as 2:2023cv03221
Plaintiff:
Frederick Sap
Defendant:
Hairline Time, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Epperson v. Chemical Weapons Convention et al
as 1:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Chris Epperson
Defendant:
Chemical Weapons Convention, Oracle, SAP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Proven Networks, LLC v. SAP America, Inc. et al
as 3:2022mc80023
In Re:
RPX, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Proven Networks, LLC
Defendant:
SAP America, Inc. and SAP SE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Express Mobile, Inc. v. SAP SE et al
as 3:2020cv08492
Defendant:
SAP SE, SAP America, Inc. and SAP Labs, LLC
Plaintiff:
Express Mobile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
