Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Costa Soares v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al.
as 24-2841
Petitioner: ANDRE LUIZ COSTA SOARES
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv05725
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carlos Vargas-Gutierrez v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-73535
Respondent: TONY H. PHAM, Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner: CARLOS VARGAS-GUTIERREZ
Morshed Alam v. Chuck Keeton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16825
Respondent / Appellee: OFFICE OF REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, JASON CILIBERTI, Assistant Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: MORSHED ALAM
Imran Imon v. Keeton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16596
Respondent / Appellee: JASON CILIBERTI, in his official capacity as Assistant Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHUCK KEETON, in his official capacity as Warden of the La Palma Correctional Center, CESAR TOPETE, in his official capacity as Assistnat Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: IMRAN HOSSAIN IMON
Jhonnatan Brinez Urdaneta, et al v. Keeton, et al
as 20-16363
Respondent: FRED FIGUEROA, in his official capacity as Warden of the Eloy Detention Center, ALBERT R. CARTER, in his official capacity as Acting Phoenix Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JASON CILIBERTI, in his official capacity as Assistant Phoenix Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: BISMER RODRIGUEZ ALVAREZ, LANDY SANCHEZ RAMOS, CLAUDIA AVALOS INCHICAQUE and others
Abdul Mirzada v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-71626
Respondent: WENDELL ANDERSON, Sheriff-Coroner at Yuba County Detention Facility, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner: ABDUL GHAFFAR MIRZADA
Hamidullah Habibi v. William Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55506
Petitioner / Appellant: HAMIDULLAH HABIBI
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, Senior Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center and others
Sai v. David Pekoske, et al
as 20-15615
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAI, on Plaintiff's own behalf, and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID P. PEKOSKE, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as acting Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS
State of Washington, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 19-35914
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellant: KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, a federal agency, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, a federal agency and others
Amicus Curiae: IMMIGRANT AND HEALTHCARE SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS and IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?