Cases 1 - 10 of 1,732
Orellana-Aguilar v. Garland
as 24-3439
Petitioner:
SIMON ANTONIO ORELLANA-AGUILAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3347
Petitioner:
LIZBETH GONZALEZ RODRIGUEZ, ABAD EUGENIO ANGEL GONZALEZ and JOSUE SIMON GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Welch, et al. v. Catholic Community Services of Western Washington
as 24-3343
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA WELCH, SHERYL E. KENNON, BRANDI MCCRIEGHT and others
Defendant:
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON
Flip Squad Monopoly LLC v. Guadarrama Simon
as 2:2024cv04384
Plaintiff:
Flip Squad Monopoly LLC
Defendant:
Guadarrama Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Simon, et al. v. Crouchaine, et al.
as 24-3212
Plaintiff:
RONALD P. SIMON and TERESA J. SIMON
Defendant:
JAYN CROUCHAINE, DORIS STRAND and WAYNE JANKE
Simon, et al. v. Crouchaine, et al.
as 24-3213
Plaintiff:
RONALD P. SIMON and TERESA J. SIMON
Defendant:
JAYN CROUCHAINE, DORIS STRAND and WAYNE JANKE
Wensley-Garcia v. Mountbatten et al
as 3:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Colleen Marie Wensley-Garcia, Tracy Dunn and Grace Victoria Mountbatten
Defendant:
Charles Mountbatten, Fiona Irinka Strauss, Lavaughn Irene Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dalrada Financial Corporation et al v. Deprey Company et al
as 3:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Dalrada Financial Corporation and Dalrada Precision Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Deprey Company, Steven A. Deprey, Pat Muench and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
(PC) Booth v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge, Lopez, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
