Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00739
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sallie Mae Servicing, L.P. v. Olivares
as 2:2011ms00079
Defendant:
Julio Olivares
Plaintiff:
Sallie Mae Servicing, L.P.
Sallie Mae Servicing LP v. Allen et al
as 3:2010mc05033
Plaintiff:
Sallie Mae Servicing LP
Defendant:
Eric A Allen and Allen Marital Community
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01672
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sallie Mae Servicing LP v. Wiseman et al
as 3:2008mc05046
Plaintiff:
Sallie Mae Servicing LP
Defendant:
Dennis E Wiseman and Jane Doe Wiseman
Ann Chae, et al v. SLM Corporation, et al
as 08-56154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANN CHAE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, WILLIAM COAKLEY, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, HOON KOO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SLM CORPORATION, DBA Sallie Mae, SALLIE MAE SERVICING CORPORATION and SALLIE MAE, INC
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING and NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER
Sallie Mae Servicing, L.P. v. Rogers
as 2:2008ms00018
Plaintiff:
Sallie Mae Servicing, L.P.
Defendant:
Rayna L. Rogers
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Sallie Mae Servicing, L.P. v. Archbold
as 1:2008mc00033
Plaintiff:
Sallie Mae Servicing, L.P.
Defendant:
Kim S. Archbold
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
