Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Geraldine Pierce et al v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 2:2017cv07267
Plaintiff:
A.C.L.U., A.C.L.U., Anti-Racist Action and others
Conjoined:
American Society Journalist, Bayview-Newspaper, Congress Watch and others
Defendant:
Carlos T. Bea, Sgt. K. Bell, Nancy Bell and others
UNder Lock And Key:
M.I.M.
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government, et al
as 16-17031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE U.S. GOVERNMENT AND ITS OFFICERS AS FEDERAL JUDGES, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER and others
Seavon Pierce v. U.S. Congre
as 16-17025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. CONGRESS
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government et al
as 2:2016cv08010
Defendant:
Pierce V. Gonzales, Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, President Barack Obama and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government et al
as 2:2016cv07556
Defendant:
Attorney General Kamala Harris, The California Department Corrections, The U.S. Government and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Seavon Pierce et al v. John E. McDermott
as 2:2016cv07554
Plaintiff:
A.C.L.U., Human Rights Watch, L.A. Times Newspaper and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Judicial Commission, Julie L. Garland and others
Seavon Pierce v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-16813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, President, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, Attorney General, PUBLIC CORRUPTION SECTION, FBI and others
Seavon Pierce v. Sacramento News and Review, et al
as 16-16740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
SACRAMENTO NEWS AND REVIEW, MODESTO BEE, NEW YORK TIMES NEWS and others
Seavon Pierce v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 16-16722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, ANTHONY DA SILVA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
