Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Sergio Diaz v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv09364
Plaintiff:
Sergio Diaz
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Diaz Castillo v. Garland
as 21-397
Petitioner:
SERGIO DIAZ CASTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Quality Roadside Service, Inc. et al v. City of Riverside et al
as 5:2020cv00576
Defendant:
Larry Gonzalez, Gary Geuss, Sergio Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Quality Roadside Service, Inc. dba Liberty Towing, Quality Roadside Service, Inc., Rita Bodagh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Louis Jean-Louis v. City of Riverside, et al
as 19-55175
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, JAMES JEB BROWN, GARY MERK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS J. JEAN-LOUIS, Relator; ex rel. United States of America
United States of America et al v. City of Riverside et al
as 5:2017cv00379
Defendant:
Steve Adams, Lisa Anhorn, William Rusty Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Louis J. Jean-Louis and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hugo Esqueda v. Sergio Diaz et al
as 2:2017cv06121
Defendant:
Sergio Diaz and Does
Plaintiff:
Hugo Esqueda
Tyqwon Eugene Welch v. Magdaleno et al
as 5:2017cv00543
Respondent:
Sheriff Sgt. Acevedo, Sheriff Alvare, Sheriff Snr. Amador and others
Plaintiff:
Tyqwon Eugene Welch
Welch v. Magdaleno et al
as 3:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Tyqwon Eugene Welch
Defendant:
Magdaleno, Galvan, Keene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Easley, et al v. City of Riverside, et al
as 16-55941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EASLEY and STEPHANIA SESSION
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, SERGIO DIAZ, SILVIO MACIAS and others
Andres Adame, et al. v. Comtrak Logistics, Inc. et al.
as 5:2015cv02232
Plaintiff:
Andres Adame, Edgar Alejo, Edwin Alvarado and others
Defendant:
Dan Burke, Comtrak Logistics, Inc., Does and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
