Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Buckner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00479
Plaintiff: MR Roy J Buckner and Rory J Buckner
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company and Southern Pacific Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Duntray Hardeman v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2020cv09569
Plaintiff: Duntray Hardeman
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Transportation Company and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BKK Working Group et al v. Albertsons Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05836
Plaintiff: Rohr, Inc., Univar USA Inc., Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Defendant: Ciba Geigy Corp., Ford Aerospace and Communications Corp., Friction Inc. and others
Petitioner: Barry Wright Controls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Martin Wells, et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
as 17-80098
Plaintiff - Petitioner: MARTIN WELLS, SUSAN WELLS, as Trustrees of the Martin and Susan Wells Revocable Trust and SANDRA L. HINSHAW, as Trustee of the Sandra L. Hinshaw Living Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, successor to Southern Pacific Transportation Company, SFPP, L.P., formerly known as Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc., KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "D" and others
James Mooney, et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
as 17-80078
Plaintiff - Petitioner: JAMES PAUL MOONEY and LAZY COYOTE RV VILLAGE, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, successor to SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, SFPP, L.P., formerly known as SANTA FE PACIFIC PIPELINES, Inc., formerly known as SOUTHERN PACIFIC PIPELINES, Inc., KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "D" and others
Charles Serrano, et al v. UPRR, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56562
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHARLES SERRANO, as trustees of the CHARLES SERRANO AND BARBARA SLOAN 2012 REVOCABLE TRUST, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,, BARBARA SLOAN, as trustees of the CHARLES SERRANO AND BARBARA SLOAN 2012 REVOCABLE TRUST, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, COACHELLA SELF STORAGE, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, successor to SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
Defendant: SFPP, L.P., KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "D" and KINDER MORGAN G.P., INC.
Charles Serrano, et al v. UPRR, et al
as 16-80101
Plaintiff - Respondent: CHARLES SERRANO, as trustees of the CHARLES SERRANO AND BARBARA SLOAN 2012 REVOCABLE TRUST, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,, BARBARA SLOAN, as trustees of the CHARLES SERRANO AND BARBARA SLOAN 2012 REVOCABLE TRUST, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, COACHELLA SELF STORAGE, LLC and others
Defendant - Petitioner: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, successor to SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
Defendant: SFPP, L.P., other Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines Inc other Southern Pacific Pipelines Inc, KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "D" and KINDER MORGAN G.P., INC.
Amicus Curiae - Pending: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
DTSC, California, et al v. Burlington Northern, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 03-17125
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant - Appellee: BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, as successor in interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Failway Company, UNION PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, as successor in interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and SHELL OIL COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?