Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Robert Steven Hicks v. Fredium Amir Bahadori et al
as 2:2019cv05360
Plaintiff:
Robert Steven Hicks
Defendant:
Amir aka Amir Fashions aka Amir Fashion, Frediun Amir Bahadori, Moda Italia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. California State Prison DVI
as 2:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
Steven Hicks
Defendant:
California State Prison DVI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. California States Prison DVI
as 1:2015cv00588
Plaintiff:
Steven Hicks
Defendant:
California States Prison DVI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. State Medical et al
as 2:2015cv00747
Plaintiff:
Steven Hicks
Defendant:
State Medical, State of California and Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Benavidez et al
as 3:2014cv00110
Defendant:
David H. Benavidez, Shanna Garrett, Kathleen Rae Hartmann and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hicke v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02374
Plaintiff:
Steven Hicke
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicke v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01266
Plaintiff:
Steven Hicke
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hicks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00573
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Hicks v. Hartmann et al
as 3:2012cv00369
Defendant:
David H. Benavidez, Lawrence B. Bernard, Deborah S. Gallagher and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hicks vs Sedgwick et al
as 3:2012cv00267
Petitioner:
Steven Hicks
Respondent:
Sedgwick and Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
