Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Derwin Jules Jackson v. T.L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Derwin Jules Jackson
Respondent:
T. L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01207
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01056
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01039
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
T.L. et al v. Segway Inc.
as 3:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
T. L.
Defendant:
Segway Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United Financial Casualty Company v. Carlos Leon et al
as 2:2023cv04557
Plaintiff:
United Financial Casualty Company
Defendant:
Carlos Leon, Eva Leon, T. L. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Paul Montanez v. T.L. Campbell
as 2:2023cv01058
Petitioner:
Paul Montanez
Respondent:
T. L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abijah Williams v. T. L. Campbell
as 5:2022cv02012
Petitioner:
Abijah Seanell Williams
Respondent:
T. L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harvey v. AK CHIN Indian Community et al
as 2:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
T L Harvey
Defendant:
AK CHIN Indian Community, AK CHIN Tribal Gaming Agency, Caesars Entertainment Corporation AK Chin operator of Chop Block Restaurant doing business as Chop Block Restaurant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
