Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Association of Village Council Presidents et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff: Association of Village Council Presidents and Tanana Chiefs Conference
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Department of Commerce, Gina M. Raimondo and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tanana Chiefs Conference v. Greer
as 4:2021cv00014
Plaintiff: Tanana Chiefs Conference
Defendant: Matthew Greer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenaitze Indian Tribe et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv04483
Plaintiff: Arctic Slope Native Association, Eastern Aleutian Tribes, Asacarsarmiut Tribe and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: McKinsey & Co., Inc. National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation
as 3:2021md02996
Plaintiff: Washington County Fiscal Court, Meade County Fiscal Court, Menifee County Fiscal Court and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C., McKinsey & Company Inc and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Tort Reform Association, State of Ohio and others
Interested Party: Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tanana Chiefs Conference v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv04251
Defendant: Phillip Morris USA, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Plaintiff: Tanana Chiefs Conference
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bowers et al v. Denali State Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00007
Defendant: Dena' Nena' Henash, First National Bank Alaska, Denali Bancorp Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Yukon Maxi-Storage, Gerald L. Bowers, Bowers General Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
State of Washington et al v. Russell Vought et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00002
Plaintiff: Association Of King County Historical Organizations, State of Washington, Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska and others
Defendant: National Archives and Records Administration, Emily W. Murphy, Office of Management and Budget and others
Amicus Curiae: Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality and Historians
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Beetus v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv00044
Defendant: Dena' Nena' Henash d/b/a Tanana Chiefs Conference, Eric Adams, United States of America and others
Plaintiff: Chantel Sharae Louise Beetus
Alatna Village Council et al v. Padgett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00253
Plaintiff: Tanana Tribal Council, Evansville Tribal Council, Alatna Village Council and others
Defendant: Chad Padgett, Gregory Dudgeon, United States Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Alaska Dept Nat Res, et al v. Agnes Purdy, et al
as 19-35288
Defendant: DENA' NENA' HENASH, Tanana Chiefs Conference, an Alaska non-profit corporation, FRANCES E. MASSENGALE, DAVID N. DONALD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES and STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Defendant / Appellant: AGNES M. PURDY, Owner of Native Allotment No. 50-2008-0437 certificate no.; that portion of Native Allotment No. 50-2008-0437 currently occupied by Chicken Ridge Alternate, Myers Fork Spur, Chicken to Franklin and Chicken Ridge Trails, containing 17. and BARBARA A. REDMON, on behalf of Anne L. Purdy, Owner of Native Allotment No. 50-2013-0004, certificate no.; that portion of Native Allotment No. 50-2013-0004 currently occupied by Chicken to Franklin and Chicken Ridge Trails, containing approximately

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?