Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Leibel v. Gregory et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Leibel
Defendant:
Thomas Gregory, Ed Garren, Kristine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Shea v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-16778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS GREGORY SHEA
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Shea v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gregory Shea
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
USA v. Thomas Bailey
as 21-30235
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS GREGORY BAILEY
Leibel v. Garren et al
as 2:2020cv02310
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Leibel
Defendant:
Thomas Gregory, Ed Garren, Kristine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doucette et al v. Stone et al
as 4:2019cv08148
Plaintiff:
The Law Offices of T. Greg Doucette, PLLC and Thomas Gregory Doucette
Defendant:
Dropbox, Inc., Ronald Kevin Stone and North Carolina Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
(PS) Harvey v. Nevada et al
as 2:2019cv01123
Defendant:
Bernadette Smith, Terri Rosier, Matthew Ence and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Shea v. USA, et al
as 18-16630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS GREGORY SHEA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MICHAEL HALEY, Sheriff
Shea v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv00112
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gregory Shea
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Paul v. Lamere et al
as 3:2018cv00049
Defendant:
Bernard F. Lamere and Scott Robertson
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gregory Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
