Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Reuter et al v. Pompeo et al
as 2:2020cv02180
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dawson Reuter and Dulce Victoria Galindo Felix
Defendant:
Michael R. Pompeo, Chad F Wolf, Eric S. Cohan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Craig Dawson, et al v. T. Givens, et al
as 16-35886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON and LOLA GLENN
Defendant - Appellee:
T. GIVENS, PHILLIPI, JEFF PREMO, Superintendent and others
Dawson v. Premo et al
as 6:2015cv00568
Petitioner:
Craig Thomas Dawson
Respondent:
Jeff Premo, State Parole Board and Washington County D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benny Abucejo v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05666
Plaintiff:
Benny Abucejo, Mario Aguilar, Phillip Alaniz, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Dawson v. Premo et al
as 6:2014cv01100
Petitioner:
Craig Thomas Dawson
Respondent:
Oregon State Penn and Supt. Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Craig Dawson v. Brian Belleque
as 12-35569
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN BELLEQUE
Craig Dawson v. Brian Belleque
as 12-35555
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN BELLEQUE
Craig Dawson, et al v. Finn, et al
as 11-35747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON and SUSAN DAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FINN, Prison Guard, RICHARDS, Prison Guard, JEFF PREMO, Supt. Oregon State Penitentiary and others
Craig Dawson v. USDC-ORP
as 11-72188
:
In re: CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON
Petitioner:
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest:
BRIAN BELLEQUE, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
Craig Dawson, et al v. Finn, et al
as 11-35486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON and SUSAN DAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FINN, Prison Guard, RICHARDS, Prison Guard, JEFF PREMO, Supt. Oregon State Penitentiary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
