Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Martin et al v. Black et al
as 4:2023cv03564
Plaintiff: Thomas E. Martin, John E. Sickle, Jr., John R. Sindyla and others
Defendant: Steven D. Black, Mark A. Chancy, Celeste A. Clark and others
Interested Party: Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado
Intervenor: Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund, Jose F. Isais, Timothy Himstreet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Martin v. Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 4:2015cv00049
Plaintiff: Thomas E Martin
Defendant: Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Martin et al
as 2:2009at01229
Plaintiff: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant: Thomas E Martin, Diane Carol Martin, Thomas E. Martin, as trustee for the Thomas E. Martin Trust, established December 26, 2002 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Type: Contract None
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Martin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02147
Plaintiff: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant: Thomas E Martin, Diane Carol Martin, Thomas E. Martin, as trustee for the Thomas E. Martin Trust, established December 26, 2002 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Type: Contract None
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. v. Natoma Valley Ridge, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02715
Plaintiff: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant: Natoma Valley Ridge, LLC, GSJ Company, LLC, Grant Avenue, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?