Cases 1 - 10 of 610
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Correa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024at01044
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joshua Correa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Correa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02186
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joshua Correa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Andersen, et al. v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al.
as 24-4889
Defendant:
DOES, 1-20, inclusive and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a corporation
Plaintiff:
OSCAR REYES, CORRINE PACHECO, ERIC ANDERSEN and others
Goins, et al. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 24-4842
Plaintiff:
SAYSAMONE NANTHAVONG, CRYSTAL RYAN-WILLIAMS, SAMANTHA WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06320
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Goepfert v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 24-4467
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a foreign public utility corporation doing business in Washington State
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S. GOEPFERT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
