Cases 1 - 10 of 162
United States of America for the use and benefit of Curtin Maritime, Corp v. Trade West Construction, Inc et al
as 6:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Curtin Maritime, Corp
Defendant:
Trade West Construction, Inc and Endurance Assurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc., a California corporation and United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc.
Defendant:
Stronghold Engineering, Inc., a California corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, A Massachusetts Corporation, Stronghold Engineering, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
United States of America v. Globalnet and Associates, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
S.R. Bray, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Power Plus! and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of S.R. BRAY, LLC, a California limited liability company doing business as Power Plus!
Petitioner:
Defendant The Gray Insurance Company, a Louisiana corporation
Defendant:
Globalnet & Associates, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DLC Electric, Inc., a California corporation, Globalnet and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United States of America for the use and benefit of Hamer Electric, Inc. v. Wu & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01515
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Hamer Electric, Inc. and United States of America for the use and benefit of Hamer Electric, Inc.
Defendant:
Wu & Associates, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Patriot Construction et al
as 3:2023cv04743
Plaintiff:
DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Patriot Construction and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023at00589
Plaintiff:
DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Solpac Construction, Inc. dba Soltek Pacific Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., et al. v. Solpac Construction, Inc., et al.
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Solpac Construction, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as Soltek Pacific Construction Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. RT Contractor Corp et al
as 2:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the Use and Benefit of APS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
RT CONTRACTOR CORP., a California corporation and Great American Insurance Company, an Ohio corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
as 3:2023cv05032
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Safari Electric LLC, United States of America and Safari Electric LLC
Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United States of America, for the use and benefit of TL Scanlan Construction, Inc. et al v. Portillo Concrete, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02020
Plaintiff:
United States of America, for the use and benefit of TL Scanlan Construction, Inc. and TL Scanlan Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Portillo Concrete, Inc. and The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
