Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Rivas-Vizcarra v. Garland
as 24-2234
Petitioner:
JORGE ARIEL RIVAS-VIZCARRA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Rivas-Vizcarra
as 24-2128
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JORGE A. RIVAS-VIZCARRA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Christopher Wilson et al v. Travis Carnochan et al
as 2:2023cv03496
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wilson and Johanna Vizcarra
Defendant:
Deputy Travis Carnochan, Deputy Priscilla Ana, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Medina v. Campbell
as 1:2023cv00381
Petitioner:
Cesario Vizcarra Medina
Respondent:
Tammy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryan Bonham v. State of Nevada Ex Rel, et al
as 23-15175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN P. BONHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA EX REL, NEVADA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, ex rel, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Cesario Medina v. Pitchess Detention Center South Facility, et al
as 23-55109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CESARIO VIZCARRA MEDINA
Defendant / Appellee:
PITCHESS DETENTION CENTER SOUTH FACILITY, PITCHESS DETENTION CENTER NORTH FACILITY, MCJ LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Vizcarra v. Michaels Stores, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Nea Vizcarra
Defendant:
Michaels Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dixon et al v. Salkoff et al
as 2:2022cv01197
Plaintiff:
S. Seanah Dixon and Toney A. White
Defendant:
S Salkoff, Terrence Jackson, Ernesto Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Medina v. CDCR et al
as 1:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Cesario Vizcarra Medina
Defendant:
CDCR, Connie Gipson and Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
