Cases 1 - 10 of 5,907
Hill v. Santiagos et al
as 4:2024cv03519
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Santiagos, Tom, Monique and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Arlean et al
as 4:2024cv03522
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Arlean and Dr. Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Joe Ledezma v. James Hill
as 2:2024cv04888
Petitioner:
Joe Ledezma
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez et al v. Rose Hills Company
as 2:2024cv04827
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Perez
Petitioner:
Rose Hills Mortuary, L.P.
Defendant:
Rose Hills Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Perez v. Rose Hills Mortuary, LLP et al
as 2:2024cv04824
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Perez
Defendant:
Rose Hills Mortuary, LLP and Rose Hills Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(PC) Hill v. CDC
as 2:2024cv01607
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hill
Defendant:
California Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledezma v. Hill
as 5:2024cv03393
Petitioner:
Joe Ledezma
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. California Department of Correction
as 5:2024cv03343
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hill
Defendant:
California Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leslie Chappel et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv04628
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA, Morse Tec, LLC, Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Chappel and Linda Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
