Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 138
X Corp. v. Center for Countering Digital Hate, Inc., et al.
as 24-2643
Plaintiff: X CORP., a Nevada corporation
Defendant: CENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE, INC., a Washington, D.C. non-profit corporation, CENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE LTD., Center for Countering Digital Hate Ltd. and STICHTING EUROPEAN CLIMATE FOUNDATION
Community Association for Restoration of the Environment Inc, et al. v. DeCoster, et al.
as 24-62
Plaintiff / Appellee: COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT INC, a Washington non-profit corporation, FRIENDS OF TOPPENISH CREEK, a Washington non-profit corporation and CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, a Washington, D.C. non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellant: AUSTIN JACK DECOSTER, DECOSTER ENTERPRISES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT-FUND II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
In re: McKinsey & Co., Inc. National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation
as 3:2021md02996
Plaintiff: Washington County Fiscal Court, Meade County Fiscal Court, Menifee County Fiscal Court and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C., McKinsey & Company Inc and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Tort Reform Association, State of Ohio and others
Interested Party: Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
X Corp v. Center for Countering Digital Hate, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03836
Plaintiff: X Corp, a Nevada Corporation and X Corp
Defendant: Center for Countering Digital Hate, Inc., a Washington, D.C. non-profit corporation, Center for Countering Digital Hate Ltd., a British non-profit organization, DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Priest v. United States of America (Corporation), et al.
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff: Steven Paul Priest
Defendant: United States of America (Corporation), Successors and Assigns, Merick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Washington D.C. District Court We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00692
Plaintiff: Dolores Kelly
Defendant: Washington D.C. District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Bradford v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 6:2021cv01653
Plaintiff: Rocky J. Bradford
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation a Washington D.C. corporation doing business as Amtrak, Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Seating and Mobility, L.L.C. a Missouri limited liability company doing business as Numotion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
City of Sacramento et al v. McKinsey and Co., Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01062
Plaintiff: City of Sacramento and People of the State of California
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc., McKinsey & Company Inc. United States and McKinsey & Company Inc. Washington D.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy cases and proceedings under title 11
City of Sacramento et al v. McKinsey and Co., Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00141
Plaintiff: City of Sacramento and People of the State of California
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. McKinsey & Co. Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff: White Mountain Apache Tribe
Defendant: McKinsey & Co. Inc., McKinsey Holdings Inc., McKinsey & Company United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?