Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Carter v. Dressen et al
as 2:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Shannon Carter
Defendant:
Frank Dressen, Jeremy Bean and Kenneth Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Carter v. Cook County Health et al
as 2:2023cv01866
Plaintiff:
Noel Carter
Defendant:
Cook County Health and Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Latorre v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jorge Latorre
Defendant:
Brown, Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Trane Technologies Health and Welfare Benefit Plan et al
as 2:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Carter
Defendant:
Trane Technologies Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and Trane Technologies Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Provino v. Wray et al
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Raphael M. Provino
Defendant:
FBI Director Christopher Wray, Jeffrey E. Church, John Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEALED v. USA
as 2:2023cv00582
Petitioner:
Keith Carter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B Ellis, Jim M. Greenlee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bernard-Ex v. Carter
as 2:2022cv02094
Plaintiff:
Mr. Clayton-M. Bernard-Ex
Defendant:
Jerome Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
