Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Crooks v. State of Montana
as 6:2018cv00056
Petitioner:
George William Crooks
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crooks v. State of Montana
as 9:2018cv00072
Petitioner:
George William Crooks
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crooks v. State of Montana
as 9:2017cv00144
Petitioner:
George William Crooks
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crooks v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2015cv02265
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
William Crooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Powell's Books, Inc., et al v. John Kroeger, et al
as 09-35153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., OLD MULTNOMAH BOOK STORE, LTD., DBA Annie Bloom's Books, DARK HORSE COMICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OREGON, CANDACE MORGAN, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, MATT SHIRTCLIFF, Baker County District Attorney, in his official capacity, JOHN HAROLDSON, Benton County District Attorney, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
THE THOMAS JEFFERSON CENTER FOR THE PROTECTION OF FREE EXPRESSION
American Civil Liberties Union, et al v. John Kroger, et al
as 09-35154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OREGON, CANDACE MORGAN, PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA/WILLAMETTE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., OLD MULTNOMAH BOOK STORE, LTD., DBA Annie Bloom's Books, DARK HORSE COMICS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, MATT SHIRTCLIFF, Baker County District Attorney, in his official capacity, JOHN HAROLDSON, Benton County District Attorney, in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
