Cases 1 - 10 of 24
William Lewis Ross III v. Arrowhead Credit Union et al
as 5:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Ross, III
Defendant:
Arrowhead Credit Union and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2022cv05059
Plaintiff:
Morganne Mease, Trenashia Jones, Rayna Moses and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lewis v. Hanf
as 3:2019cv00625
Defendant:
Dr. Ted Hanf
Plaintiff:
William Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toney v. Gwathey M.D. et al
as 3:2018cv02786
Defendant:
Nolte Rachelle, M.D., Mr. Charles Samuels, Jr., Williams Lewis, II and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
In re Subpoena Proceedings (Superior Court, State of California, v. Agent Mario Borboa, employee of Drug Enforcement Administration)
as 3:2018cv01974
Defendant:
Subpoena Proceedings (Superior Court, State of California, v. Agent Mario Borboa, employee of Drug Enforcement Administration), Daniel Hayes Gracia, Jose Carlos Villanueva and others
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California
Petitioner:
United States and Mario Borboa
In Re:
In re Subpoena Proceedings (Superior Court, State of California, v. Agent Mario Borboa, employee of Drug Enforcement Administration)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00784
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leopona, Inc. et al v. UK Cycling Events, Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv01765
Plaintiff:
Leopona, Inc. , Don't Be A Lout Music, LLC , Lionheart Media, LLC and others
Defendant:
UK Cycling Events, Ltd. , Gareth Roelofse and Jon Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
United States of America v. William Lewis
as 2:2014cv09066
Defendant:
William Lewis
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
