Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,005
Willis v. City of Bakersfield, et al.
as 24-3154
Plaintiff: BYRON WILLIS
Defendant: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD and SANTOS LUEVANO
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner: KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party: FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
Williams, et al. v. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
as 24-2970
Plaintiff: WILLIE WILLIAMS, LADON CLINE and PAUL CONTRERAS
Defendant: J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC.
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00837
Petitioner: Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent: Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Iseli v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv00800
Plaintiff: Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant: Jeff Lynch and William D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Target Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00536
Plaintiff: Willie Simmons
Defendant: Target Corporation and Does 1 to 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Removal- Personal Injury
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01220
Petitioner: Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent: Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff: Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant: William D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00821
Petitioner: Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent: Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poon-Atkins et al v. Poon et al
as 4:2024cv01345
Plaintiff: Christy Poon-Atkins, Rhonda Barnette, Kesha Poon and others
Defendant: John Poon and David Poon

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?