Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Marielita Palacios v. Wolverine World Wide Inc.
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Marielita Palacios
Defendant:
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. d/b/a WWW.ONLINESHOES.COM and Wolverine World Wide Inc. a Delaware company doing business as www.onlineshoes.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Licea v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01564
Plaintiff:
Jose Licea
Defendant:
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. and Does through 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Bluhm v. Wyndham World Wide Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv05813
Defendant:
Wyhnham World Wide Inc., Wyndham World Wide Corporation and Wyndham
Plaintiff:
Brandon CS Bluhm and Brandon Bluhm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cold Steel, Inc. v. Bud K World Wide, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01473
Defendant:
Bud K World Wide, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Cold Steel, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kimco Staffing Services, Inc. v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09880
Defendant:
Does, Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kimco Staffing Services, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01757
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alexander Fah v. Wolverine World Wide Inc
as 8:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Alexander Fah
Defendant:
Wolverine World Wide Inc
adidas America, Inc. et al v. Wolverine World Wide Inc
as 3:2012cv00945
Defendant:
Wolverine World Wide Inc
Plaintiff:
adidas AG and adidas America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
