Cases 131 - 140 of 1,608
Smith v. Retirement System of Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Retirement System of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Circle K Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Circle K Inc. and Amy Willard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Brien v. Wormuth (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Rebecca L. O'Brien
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Brien v. Wormuth (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Rebecca L. O'Brien
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Smoak et al
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Ray Cox
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Mark Choquette, Catrina Burkhalter-Murry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Circle K Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Circle K Inc. and Amy Willard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins et al v. Montgomery County D.H.R. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Shelia K. Watkins and Wellington J. Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County D.H.R., Lauren Mann, Robert Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Lee County Commission of Lee County, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 3:2022cv00713
Defendant:
Deputy McElroy, Lee County Commission of Lee County, Alabama, Deputy Kamisi and others
Plaintiff:
Lateefah Muhammad
Petitioner:
Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
H. v. Buckner
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
E. H.
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner and Kim Mashego
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Prattville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC et al (MAG+)
as 3:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Charles Stanton Sullivan, Jr.
Defendant:
Prattville Health and Rehabilitation, Llc, Medicare, Maximum Federal Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
