Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. RSA Tower et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
RSA Tower, Donald Terry and Associates and RSA Regions Bank Tower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. RSA Tower et al(MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
RSA Tower, Donald Terry and Associates and RSA Regions Bank Tower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. RSA Tower et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
RSA Tower, Donald Terry and Associates and RSA Regions Bank Tower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Regions Bank Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2019cv00213
Defendant:
Regions Bank Inc. and Regions Bank
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witwicki v. Circuit Court of Coffee County, et al (MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00920
Plaintiff:
William Witwicki
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Coffee County , Shannon R. Clark , James M. Counts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chappell v. Chase Bank/Home Finance LLC et al (MAG+)
as 2:2010cv01026
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Chappell
Defendant:
Chase Bank/Home Finance LLC, Regions Bank, Compass Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rubenstein v. Bauman et al (MAG+)
as 1:2007cv00798
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Bauman Rubenstein
Defendant:
Betty Jo Bauman, Marilyn Bauman Granger, Barbara Bauman Kamensky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Modern Woodman of America et al (MAG+)
as 3:2007cv00138
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Austin
Defendant:
Modern Woodman of America, Alfonza Menefee, Howard F. Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.