Cases 1 - 10 of 1,643
Avery v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Carlton L. Avery
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norrell v. Phenix City Public Transportation (MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00411
Defendant:
Phenix City Public Transportation
Plaintiff:
Larry Joe Norrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Alabama Alcohol Control Board et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Defendant:
Eric Jensen, Charles Price, Vernon Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunge-Shumaker v. Dothan Landmarks Foundation, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Bunge-Shumaker
Defendant:
Dothan Landmarks Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hughley v. Tinney et al
as 3:2024cv00570
Defendant:
John A. Tinney, Fred Gray, Jr. and Earnestine Sapp
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wendy's Inc. (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00565
Defendant:
Wendy's Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Judah v. The City of Dothan, Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00552
Defendant:
William E Benny, The City of Dothan, Alabama, Hunter Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Dawson Judah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Judah v. City of Dothan et al
as 2:2024cv00552
Defendant:
Hunter Sanders, Casey Beck, William E Benny and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie D. Judah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Prichett v. Stanley
as 3:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Jonquis Prichett
Defendant:
Justin Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Amerson et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Sean Henderson
Defendant:
Cody Amerson and Brady Amerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
