Cases 131 - 140 of 1,371
Cobble v. United States of America Government (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv01022
Defendant:
United States of America Government
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burch v. Elmore County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00929
Plaintiff:
Elisha A. Burch
Defendant:
Glenn J. Goggans and Elmore County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00922
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, Kay Ivey, Lynn Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Smith et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2019cv00920
Defendant:
Jamie Graham, Essie Green, Michael Bellamy and others
Plaintiff:
Rahsheike Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Woodham et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00895
Defendant:
Delores Woodham, Michael Chadwick, Evert Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Dedric Jamar Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00854
Defendant:
Ronald Reagan, Alabama Department of Corrections and Thomas E. Kilby
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jeremain Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graves v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00797
Defendant:
Sherryl Price, Alabama Department of Corrections, Agent Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Graves, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Grissett (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00755
Plaintiff:
Michael Pernell Dorsey
Defendant:
Larry R. Grissett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moseley v. Booth et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00729
Plaintiff:
Stanley Moseley
Defendant:
Joy Booth, Joseph Hicks and Steven Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pate v. Woods et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2019cv00704
Defendant:
Xi Lee and Walter Woods
Plaintiff:
Frank Edwin Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
