Cases 141 - 150 of 1,365
Moseley v. Booth et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00729
Plaintiff:
Stanley Moseley
Defendant:
Joy Booth, Joseph Hicks and Steven Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Price et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00587
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Turner
Defendant:
Charles Daniels and Cheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Woods, et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00534
Defendant:
Walter Woods and Ms. Peters
Plaintiff:
Lampton Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Patel (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00488
Defendant:
Steve Azezzano, Richard Sample, Dr. Patel and others
Plaintiff:
Sharolyn Brantley Montgomery Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. The United States et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00499
Defendant:
The United States, Alabama Law Enforcement Agency and The Congress of the United States
Plaintiff:
Hasalee Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Lisenby (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00419
Defendant:
Daryl Bailey, S. A. Lisenby and Wanda J. Robinson
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00417
Defendant:
Sonja Pritchett, Derrick Cunningham and Yvonne Robinson
Plaintiff:
Alonzo H. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nix v. Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00372
Defendant:
Lyn Head, Terry G. Davis, Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Nix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Watson (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00381
Defendant:
Chris Waston, William K. Maddox, Chris Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. Valeska et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Douglas A. Valeska, Bill Rafferty, Jackie Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Chandler Elliott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
