Cases 71 - 80 of 105
Robinson v. Kaufman et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2011cv00657
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
William Kaufman and T. Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
Marqis Jones
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Jeffery Williams, Willie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00476
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jonathan Miller
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Jeffrey Williams, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Echols v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00277
Plaintiff:
D C Echols
Defendant:
State of Alabama, H. Randall Thomas, Charles Graddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shyrie v. Warden et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00248
Plaintiff:
Tommy Ervin Shyrie
Defendant:
Billie Warden, Leigh Ann Warden, James O'Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weatherly v. Montgomery City Commission et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
Ronald Vatedro Weatherly
Defendant:
Montgomery City Commission, Montgomery City Police Dept and J. L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanderson v. Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Commission et al
as 2:2010cv00878
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Sanderson
Defendant:
Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Commission, Montgomery County Jail, Robert E. Luske, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballenger v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00844
Plaintiff:
William L. Ballenger
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Troy King, J. Christopher Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Parrish et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2010cv00780
Plaintiff:
Noah William White
Defendant:
Mike Parrish, Bryan Yates, Jeff Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Wynne et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00531
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
William W. Wynne, Robert P. Long, Cliff Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
