Cases 81 - 90 of 1,365
Pinchon v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00892
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Kay Ivey, Leigh Gwathney and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis Pinchon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonich v. Carvajal et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00864
Defendant:
Hugh Hurwitz, David Brewer, Demetrius Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
David John Lonich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Bloom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00900
Defendant:
John K. Larkins, III and Beth Bloom
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Votrobek v. Sanders et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00823
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, David Brewer, Jeffrey Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Votrobek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pfeifer v. The United States (INMATE 3)
as 1:2020cv00764
Plaintiff:
Deryke M. Pfeifer, Sr.
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Colbert County Sheriff Dept. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00837
Defendant:
Frank Williamson, Bradley Skipworth, Colbert County Sheriff Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Dwight Madden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald v. Adkins (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00818
Defendant:
Jason Adkins, Houston County Jail and Alabama Police Department
Plaintiff:
Deshone Elequail Donald and Deshone Elesquail Donald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00636
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dale Russell
Defendant:
Joe Grant, Sgt. Teal, Warden Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00692
Defendant:
John Blough and State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Steve Carlos Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00703
Plaintiff:
Toree Jones
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
