Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Keeton v. Maddox (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kister v. Lamar et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Warden At Tutwiler Prison and David Lamar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00103
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arnold
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Andrew Mark Skier, Talladega County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00062
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arnold
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Andrew Mark Skier, Talladega County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2016cv00881
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Tony Helms, Jasmine Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Large v. McFarland (INMATE 2)
as 3:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Large
Defendant:
John McFarland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Holder, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00404
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson Smith
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Barack Obama and Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Richard William Andrews
Defendant:
Robert Bentley and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barkley v. City of Dothan et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00891
Plaintiff:
Andrew Keith Barkley
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Magistrates Office, Mamie McCory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barkley v. City of Dothan, et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2011cv00891
Plaintiff:
Andrew Keith Barkley
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Magistrates Office, Mamie McCory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
