Cases 131 - 140 of 4,306
Wehunt v. Harrison (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Joel Henry Wehunt
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borden v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Justin Katdeem Borden
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bracaloni v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Noah Zachary Bracaloni
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Nurse Mindy, Nurse Evelyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sexton v. Bond et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Glenn Ray Sexton
Defendant:
Danny Bond and Hannah Scrubs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borden v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Justin Katdeem Borden
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Smith (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Korey Devon Harmon
Defendant:
Shamal K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmore v. YesCare Corp. et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
George Washington Palmore
Defendant:
YesCare Corp., Tahir Siddiq, David Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Calloway et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Reese
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Ms. Young, Ms. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Clent Freeman
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail and Ron Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nettles v. State of Alabama (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Glenn Anthony Nettles
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
