Cases 191 - 200 of 4,316
Veasey v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Veasey, II
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burks v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Toney Burks
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerrick v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Bernard Randal Kerrick
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Lobert Johnson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Wesley Lance Johnson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Kenny Alexander
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Steven Sherman
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giddens v. Pressley et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Antonio Giddens
Defendant:
Desmond Pressley, Officer Barnes and Sgt. Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madison v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Clifford Sinclair Madison
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Mr. Williams and Mr. Limpkens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheridan v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Darius Sheridan
Defendant:
Blake Truman, Thomas Hugghins, Vikki Ms. Boyett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
