Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Bailey v. Rogers (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Captain Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Rogers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Captain Rogers, Captain Norman and Brian Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Rogers (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Almendarious Owens
Defendant:
Marcus Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hershiser v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jack Dennison Hershiser
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Elmore Correctional Facility, Bullock Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rogers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Roger Jay Jones, II
Defendant:
Courtney B. Rogers and Officer Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rogers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00782
Plaintiff:
Antonio Williams and Antonio R. Williams
Defendant:
Morris Rogers, Sgt. Green, Officer Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Smith et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00662
Plaintiff:
Christopher Marcellos Scott
Defendant:
Otis Smith, Christopher Gordon, Camelia Cargle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stackhouse v. Sewell et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00430
Defendant:
Captain Howard, Morris Rogers, Lt. Sewell and others
Plaintiff:
Glen A. Stackhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Cargle et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00328
Defendant:
Captain Rogers, Warden Cargle, Lt. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
John Willie Malone, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon v. Cash et al (INMATE 1) (LEAD)
as 2:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Willie Denoris McClendon
Defendant:
K. Cash
Consolidated Defendant:
Otis Smith, William A. Tate and M. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
