Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 101 - 110 of 4,236
Norman v. White
as 2:2023cv00582
Plaintiff: Jimmy Norman
Defendant: Ell White, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton, Jr. v. Brooks (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00637
Plaintiff: Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant: Connie Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Town of Gordon (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00639
Plaintiff: Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant: Town of Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. City of Wetumpka (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00603
Plaintiff: Stacey E. Ballard
Defendant: City of Wetumpka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Ray (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00636
Plaintiff: Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant: Shana Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Lowe (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00638
Plaintiff: Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant: Albert Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pimenta et al v. Thornton et al
as 2:2023cv00613
Plaintiff: Pedro Da Silva Pimenta, Heather Staples and Pedro Miguel Da Silva Pimenta
Defendant: City of Eclectic, Charles Thornton and Charles T. Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goff v. City of Dothan et al
as 1:2023cv00687
Plaintiff: Jewett Ladon Goff
Defendant: City of Dothan, Dothan City Commission and Kevin Cowper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00685
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00594
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?