Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Heard v. Town of Camp Hill et al
as 3:2016cv00856
Plaintiff:
Douglas R. Heard
Defendant:
Town of Camp Hill , Danny Evans , Johnny R. Potts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Town of Camp Hill et al
as 3:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
Frank G. Holley
Defendant:
Town of Camp Hill , Danny Evans and Johnny L. Potts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Coffee County Alabama et al
as 1:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
Chad Evans
Defendant:
Coffee County Alabama, Dave Sutton, Scott Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Dothan Alabama, et al
as 1:2013cv00529
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Williams
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Alabama , Damon Woodham , Joey Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
King v. Parcel of land located in Section 19, Township 18, Range 12, Randolph County, Alabama et al
as 3:2008cv00302
Plaintiff:
Gladys F. King
Defendant:
Parcel of land located in Section 19, Township 18, Range 12, Randolph County, Alabama, Joyce Jones, Patricia Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
