Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Robinson v. Terry et al
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, John Q. Hamm and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Read Freely Alabama et al v. Autauga-Prattville Public Library Board of Trustees
as 2:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Read Freely Alabama, Alabama Library Assocation, Samantha Diamond and others
Defendant:
Autauga-Prattville Public Library Board of Trustees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Stallworth et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jermari Marshall and Twyla Stallworth
Defendant:
John G. Barton and City of Andalusia, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Bob Riley, John Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miles v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Vernus Miles
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hood v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hood
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
