Cases 161 - 170 of 8,754
Young v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Mario Tavarous Young
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keeton et al v. Ogletree et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton and Brian Henry Ritter
Defendant:
Sgt. Ogletree, Jay Jones, Officer Snipes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramey v. Lewis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Abraham Ramey
Defendant:
Lt. Lewis and Sgt. Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. United States of America (INMATE 3) (MEMBER)
as 2:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Kilpatrick Cornelius McKinney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. United States of America (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Ladaris Lemmon Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherch v. Terry et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cherch
Defendant:
Nurse Terry, Dr. Gurley and Quality Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Evans et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Elijah Deshawn Robinson
Defendant:
Dandrea Evans, Jarvin Jarrett, Captain Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
