Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Edwards v. Albright et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2012cv01038
Plaintiff:
Coy Edwards
Defendant:
Frank Albright and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norris v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00937
Plaintiff:
Karen Elaine Norris
Defendant:
Karla Jones and Frank Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Albright (INMATE 3)
as 2:2012cv00809
Plaintiff:
Wanda Rhodes
Defendant:
Frank Albright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hall v. Albright, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00789
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Bass Hall
Defendant:
Frank Albright, Warden Ellington, Dr. Gam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tullis v. Albright et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2012cv00685
Plaintiff:
Lisa McKinley Tullis
Defendant:
Frank Albright and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abro v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00583
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Lawana Abro
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Frank Albright and Napoleon Goodson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lawson, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tomeka Lashun Williams
Defendant:
Patrica Lawson, I. Hardin, Frank Albright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macon v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00903
Plaintiff:
Frencher D. Wyatt Macon
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Frank Albright, Karla Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waldrep v. Albright (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00622
Plaintiff:
Esther Nichole Waldrep
Defendant:
Frank Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Albright (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00618
Plaintiff:
Melinda Washington
Defendant:
Frank Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
